Résident en Arabie Saoudite depuis bientôt 10 ans, El hadj S D a décidé en juin dernier de rentrer au pays pour se marier.
Installé dans une villa à Faladjé, El Hadj avait obtenu l’accord de ses parents à Ségou pour convoler en justes noces avec sa cousine F. D. qui regagna Bamako pour les cérémonies de mariage à peine quelques jours après l’arrivée de son futur époux.
La célébration du mariage étant allée de report en report, elle a été finalement fixée au 2 novembre 2014. El Hadj cependant s’impatientait et pour accélérer les choses, couvrait de cadeaux sa future épouse. F.D. qui devenait de plus en plus cupide et exigeante. Tout est enfin prêt pour la célébration du mariage.
Nous sommes, le 2 novembre. A 16 heures, le mariage religieux avait été scellé et tam-tams et tambours ont clos la cérémonie. Il était environ 22 heures, lorsque tous les participants à la fête avaient regagné leur domicile, à l’exception de la vieille dame qui accompagnait la mariée à sa chambre nuptiale.
F.D. qui s’affairait avec une copine dans la cour, venait aussi d’aller aux toilettes. C’est alors que, impatient, El Hadj S.D. enroulé dans un drap blanc, avança vers la cour, et sans chercher à comprendre, saisit de toutes ses forces la copine de son épouse, la chargea sur son dos et alla la jeter sur le lit conjugal avec les encouragements de la vieille dame “de garde”.
Malgré les cris de secours de la copine de son épouse, El Hadj, fou de rage ne reprit ses esprits qu’après avoir assouvi ses instincts. La nouvelle mariée, effrayée par le vacarme était sur les lieux, bouche-bée. Il était trop tard. Comment réparer l’irréparable ?
Pour toute solution, il a été proposé à El hadj de marier aussi, celle qu’il venait de violer. Hélas ! La jeune fille a tout simplement refusé la proposition et demande plutôt réparation.
En attendant, une solution à l’amiable ou le tribunal, le mariage de El hadj avec F.D. a été suspendu.
(Affaire à suivre)
u are a fornicator, and this what God says if u don’t repnet. When did he or any of d pastors prophesy about any of d corrupt leaders and majority of them attend one church or d other yet they keep on commitn fraud and take part of d money to church as offering and tithe, so it is hard 4 our pastors to deliver row, I mean undiluted word and warning of God. Gone are those days that Christ Apostolic Church ministers are known has terror to d govt especially military govt but today they are are after post and money which is common among all our pastors and the people are perishing under evil men. Who really is a theif, corrupt and evil? D taker and giver of stoling things, corruption money both d giver and taker are corrupt and never support an evil person. There4 prophecy is good if only is frm God bcs is a devine message revealing hinding things by God.
, but by a sense of the sheer, utterly feigron mental/intellectual landscape i found myself in. It, in intellectual landscape terms, was more than a native Austinite going from Central Texas shrub land to East Texas Piney forest it was going from Sahara Desert to Brazilian Rainforest by an Eskimo. This girl had centuries of Islamic culture, and monarchial rule, and non-western life patterns/rhythms she had friends with homes in medinas likely older than our country. Funny thing about that, as i grow older, i realize even the folks as old as the Carry’s, or the Johnson’s, or the Adam’s occupy a mental landscape as utterly feigron to mine (by virtue of the times their lives have occupied) as this Moroccan girl, and they are from my country.Like many i have studied languages, and like most i have a sense of how each language has a flavor, a sense to it that makes the obscure metaphor (which is so idiomatic) so characteristic of the mentality of the native culture. Many ex-patriots living abroad, who seem so indicative of their adoptive cultures still seem so very American to those adoptive cultures. I remember this tv show about a bunch of cowboys that get transported through time to modern day times, and their utter confusion; CS Lewis did a similar thing in the space trilogy of his.The point i am making: It would seem that we need to frame any discussion with a certain awareness or understanding or sense of the utterly feigron intellectual landscape of the First Century Church, and our own times. Ok, obvious statement to most, but not so easy to master. Arguably it comes down to more than the difference between isigesis and exigesis- are we reading onto the text, or out of it; it comes down to being beyond the complications of translation between languages and cultures. It comes down to realizing the utterly un-bridgeable, insurmountable alienness of the two times and cultures, and maintaining that sense as we grapple with the questions at hand. Also, we have to bear in mind we haven’t gotten better (with dealing with the issues the first century church dealt with), but we have gotten different. It is not a progression and development to a better understanding, but a different understanding. This means we are not going to be able to get in their (1st Century Messianic and Gentile Christians’) heads, not going to be able to hear with their ears. It also means that anyone, and everyone, can contribute you don’t need to have studied Church History or Hermeneutics to contribute (though those whom have will contribute valuable insights, sure). We ultimately will never come to understand the 1st Century Christians as other 1st Century Christians would understand their brethren, but we will come to understand ourselves our times and culture.Am i just being esoteric, or risking gnosticism? Actually, i think i am trying to avoid them, esotericism and gnosticism. Love and Responsibility: A RambleHow utterly alien and on the cusp it must have felt for the early church brethren to have the Holy Spirit invading their midsts, and how must it have felt to have what they understood of Love to be blown up, literaly expanded from finite levels to infinite levels. How could we (as 21st century church) have our concepts of love and responsibility be turned upside down? Where do we not understand what it means to love others? Are we too quick to correct? How did the early church handle its uproarous members did they respond slowly, quickly, what did they learn from that? I don’t know, i ask the questions really questioning. It seems from Dan Davis’ fatherly fireside chat we can be doing more just by doing little acts of love and Christ said we would do more than He. There is a tension right there if we aren’t seeking God to love magnificently through small acts of kindness (like conversing and prayer), why would we think we will find Him and His Spirit when He is leading us to Heal blindness? It is good to seek amazing prophetic words and miraculous healings, but are we seeking those to come in the form of little kindnesses or big demonstrations? See, here is the rub:If we aren’t conceiving of Love and our Christian duty to occupy those little levels, are we going to be able to hear stories like Rick Van Dyke’s comment (on the 1st post) and grapple with the frequently raised question: should we be living commune/communally’ like the 1st Century church ? Given Frank’s point, that response of theirs was in response not to intentionally chosen lifestyle but confusion over what was appropriate responses to Holy Spirit outpouring, then how can we hope to choose a patternistic lifestyle of love if we don’t have a concept of love and responsibility and work of the Spirit that causes us to simply seek to love someone through conversing (without needing to drop a Gospel Bomb on them)?If what i said earlier (about only understanding our 21st century American perspective) holds water, then any answer to these questions only yields what we think to be the case, and might not be applicable to say the Turkish church can we live with that? (This question is at the heart of relativism, and the complaints that no one denomination or culture has a premium on the truth.)
n’importe quoi! j’ai lu cette histoire sur le site, il y a peut être 2 ans.
meublez intelligemment vos journaux!
😯 😀 mouahahahahahhaahahahhha 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆 😆
C’est un Diarra, n’est ce pas ? 😀
Idiot, IL est écrit S.D. donc Souleymane DEMBELE ou DIOP. 😆
Il n’y a que Boubacar Sangare pour ecrire des histoires pareilles 😆 😆 😆 😆 , n’est ce pas l’homme de Bassikounou? 🙁 🙁 🙁
Sil vous plait arretez de nous distraire cette histoire a ete raconte ici et aujourdhui vous changez le sdates pour dire 2 novembre 2014
Comments are closed.